Head-to-Head Analysis

Assorted Chocolates vs Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Assorted Chocolates

Assorted Chocolates

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original

Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
594 kcal
Energy
394 kcal
40.6g
Sugars
36.4g
40.6g
Fat
9.1g
9.4g
Protein
3g
0.2g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Assorted Chocolates and Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Assorted Chocolates is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Assorted Chocolates contains significantly more sugar (40.6g) compared to the milder Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original (36.4g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Assorted Chocolates offers a protein boost with 9.38g per 100g, outperforming Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Assorted Chocolates or Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original?

It depends on your goals. Assorted Chocolates has 594 calories, while Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original has 394 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Assorted Chocolates vegan?

No, Assorted Chocolates is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Assorted Chocolates and Rice Krispies Treats Homestyle Original?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.