Atlantic Salmon Fillet vs Wild caught tuna
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Atlantic Salmon Fillet
Wild caught tuna
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Atlantic Salmon Fillet and Wild caught tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Atlantic Salmon Fillet is the clear winner. With 133 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Atlantic Salmon Fillet or Wild caught tuna?
It depends on your goals. Atlantic Salmon Fillet has 0 calories, while Wild caught tuna has 132.74336283186 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Atlantic Salmon Fillet vegan?
No, Atlantic Salmon Fillet is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Atlantic Salmon Fillet and Wild caught tuna?
There is a difference of 133 calories per 100g between the two products.
