Head-to-Head Analysis

ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS vs Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS

ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers

Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
223.2 kcal
Energy
50 kcal
0g
Sugars
10g
16.1g
Fat
0g
20.5g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS and Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS is the more energy-dense option here, packing 173 more calories per 100g than Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS offers a protein boost with 20.5357142857143g per 100g, outperforming Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS or Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers?

It depends on your goals. ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS has 223.214285714286 calories, while Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS vegan?

No, ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ATLANTIC SALMON FILLET SKINLESS and Organic Apple Fruit Sauce Crushers?

There is a difference of 173 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.