Head-to-Head Analysis

Back Bacon Rasher vs Farms uncured slow cooked ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Back  Bacon Rasher

Back Bacon Rasher

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Farms uncured slow cooked ham

Farms uncured slow cooked ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
303 kcal
Energy
109 kcal
0.5g
Sugars
0g
22.7g
Fat
3.6g
24.3g
Protein
20g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Back Bacon Rasher and Farms uncured slow cooked ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Back Bacon Rasher is the more energy-dense option here, packing 194 more calories per 100g than Farms uncured slow cooked ham. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Back Bacon Rasher offers a protein boost with 24.3g per 100g, outperforming Farms uncured slow cooked ham in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Back Bacon Rasher or Farms uncured slow cooked ham?

It depends on your goals. Back Bacon Rasher has 303 calories, while Farms uncured slow cooked ham has 109 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Back Bacon Rasher vegan?

No, Back Bacon Rasher is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Back Bacon Rasher and Farms uncured slow cooked ham?

There is a difference of 194 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.