Head-to-Head Analysis

Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots vs 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots

Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots

Not Vegan
VS
Package of 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
72.6 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
3.2g
Sugars
13.3g
3.2g
Fat
46.7g
3.2g
Protein
6.7g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots and 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots is the clear winner. With 460 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots takes the lead with only 3.23g of sugar per 100g, whereas 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips contains 13.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots or 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips?

Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots vegan?

No, Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bacon Ranch Broccoli And Carrots and 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips?

There is a difference of 460 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.