Head-to-Head Analysis

BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS vs Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS

BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk

Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
465 kcal
10g
Sugars
39.5g
9.7g
Fat
18.6g
34.4g
Protein
4.7g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS and Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS is the more energy-dense option here, packing 106 more calories per 100g than Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS takes the lead with only 10g of sugar per 100g, whereas Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk contains 39.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS offers a protein boost with 34.375g per 100g, outperforming Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS or Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk?

It depends on your goals. BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS has 571 calories, while Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk has 465 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS vegan?

No, BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between BAGIETKA BEKON STRIPS and Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk?

There is a difference of 106 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.