Head-to-Head Analysis

Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored vs KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored

Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS

KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
438 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
0g
25g
Fat
32.1g
6.3g
Protein
7.1g
1.6g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored and KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored is the clear winner. With 98 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored contains significantly more sugar (6.25g) compared to the milder KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored or KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS?

It depends on your goals. Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored has 438 calories, while KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored vegan?

No, Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Baked Buttery Crackers, Naturally Flavored and KRINKLE CUT PINK SALT POTATO CHIPS?

There is a difference of 98 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.