Baladna vs anafaf
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Baladna
anafaf
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Baladna and anafaf side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Baladna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 589 more calories per 100g than anafaf. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Baladna takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas anafaf contains 11g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Baladna offers a protein boost with 28.2g per 100g, outperforming anafaf in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Baladna or anafaf?
It depends on your goals. Baladna has 600 calories, while anafaf has 11 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Baladna vegan?
No, Baladna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Baladna and anafaf?
There is a difference of 589 calories per 100g between the two products.
