Head-to-Head Analysis

Baladna vs Sweet Energy Trail

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Baladna

Baladna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Energy Trail

Sweet Energy Trail

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
600 kcal
Energy
455 kcal
0g
Sugars
51.5g
49.4g
Fat
21.2g
28.2g
Protein
9.1g
0.3g
Salt
265g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Baladna and Sweet Energy Trail side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Baladna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 145 more calories per 100g than Sweet Energy Trail. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Baladna takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Energy Trail contains 51.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Baladna offers a protein boost with 28.2g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Energy Trail in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Baladna or Sweet Energy Trail?

It depends on your goals. Baladna has 600 calories, while Sweet Energy Trail has 455 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Baladna vegan?

No, Baladna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Baladna and Sweet Energy Trail?

There is a difference of 145 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.