Head-to-Head Analysis

Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut vs Kodiak cubs waffles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut

Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kodiak cubs waffles

Kodiak cubs waffles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
534 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
10g
30g
Fat
11.4g
17g
Protein
11.4g
1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut and Kodiak cubs waffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut is the more energy-dense option here, packing 234 more calories per 100g than Kodiak cubs waffles. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut takes the lead with only 3.5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kodiak cubs waffles contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Kodiak cubs waffles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut or Kodiak cubs waffles?

It depends on your goals. Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut has 534 calories, while Kodiak cubs waffles has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut vegan?

No, Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bamba peanut butter snacks all natural peanut and Kodiak cubs waffles?

There is a difference of 234 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.