Head-to-Head Analysis

Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch vs Wheat Thins reduced fat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch

Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wheat Thins reduced fat

Wheat Thins reduced fat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
414 kcal
32g
Sugars
13.8g
14g
Fat
12.1g
28g
Protein
6.9g
1g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch and Wheat Thins reduced fat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch is the clear winner. With 14 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch contains significantly more sugar (32g) compared to the milder Wheat Thins reduced fat (13.8g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wheat Thins reduced fat is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch offers a protein boost with 28g per 100g, outperforming Wheat Thins reduced fat in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch or Wheat Thins reduced fat?

It depends on your goals. Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch has 400 calories, while Wheat Thins reduced fat has 414 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch vegan?

No, Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bar gold chocolate mint cookie crunch and Wheat Thins reduced fat?

There is a difference of 14 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.