Head-to-Head Analysis

Barbecue flavored potato chips vs Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Barbecue flavored potato chips

Barbecue flavored potato chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin

Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535.7 kcal
Energy
867 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
32.1g
Fat
93.3g
7.1g
Protein
0g
2.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Barbecue flavored potato chips and Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Barbecue flavored potato chips is the clear winner. With 331 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Barbecue flavored potato chips contains significantly more sugar (3.5714285714286g) compared to the milder Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Barbecue flavored potato chips offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Barbecue flavored potato chips or Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin?

It depends on your goals. Barbecue flavored potato chips has 535.71428571429 calories, while Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin has 867 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Barbecue flavored potato chips vegan?

No, Barbecue flavored potato chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Barbecue flavored potato chips and Organic Coconut Oil, Virgin?

There is a difference of 331 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.