Head-to-Head Analysis

Bare Crunchy Almond Butter vs Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Bare Crunchy Almond Butter

Bare Crunchy Almond Butter

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta

Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
562.5 kcal
Energy
29.4 kcal
3.1g
Sugars
0g
50g
Fat
0g
21.9g
Protein
1.2g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bare Crunchy Almond Butter and Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bare Crunchy Almond Butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 533 more calories per 100g than Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Bare Crunchy Almond Butter contains significantly more sugar (3.13g) compared to the milder Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Bare Crunchy Almond Butter offers a protein boost with 21.88g per 100g, outperforming Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bare Crunchy Almond Butter or Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta?

It depends on your goals. Bare Crunchy Almond Butter has 562.5 calories, while Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta has 29.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bare Crunchy Almond Butter vegan?

No, Bare Crunchy Almond Butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bare Crunchy Almond Butter and Hearts of Palm Linguine Pasta?

There is a difference of 533 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.