Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs vs Melba snacks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs
Melba snacks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs and Melba snacks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs is the clear winner. With 226 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Melba snacks contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Melba snacks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs or Melba snacks?
Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs vegan?
No, Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Basil Pesto Chicken Thighs and Melba snacks?
There is a difference of 226 calories per 100g between the two products.
