Head-to-Head Analysis

Basmati Rice vs Marsala cooking wine

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Basmati Rice

Basmati Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Marsala cooking wine

Marsala cooking wine

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
356 kcal
Energy
150 kcal
0g
Sugars
13.3g
0g
Fat
0g
8.9g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Basmati Rice and Marsala cooking wine side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Basmati Rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 206 more calories per 100g than Marsala cooking wine. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Basmati Rice takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Marsala cooking wine contains 13.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Basmati Rice offers a protein boost with 8.89g per 100g, outperforming Marsala cooking wine in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Basmati Rice or Marsala cooking wine?

It depends on your goals. Basmati Rice has 356 calories, while Marsala cooking wine has 150 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Basmati Rice vegan?

No, Basmati Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Basmati Rice and Marsala cooking wine?

There is a difference of 206 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.