Head-to-Head Analysis

Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide vs Lays Stax Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide

Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lays Stax Original

Lays Stax Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
428.6 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
17.1g
Sugars
3.6g
20g
Fat
28.6g
28.6g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide and Lays Stax Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide is the clear winner. With 107 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide contains significantly more sugar (17.142857142857g) compared to the milder Lays Stax Original (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lays Stax Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide offers a protein boost with 28.571428571429g per 100g, outperforming Lays Stax Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide or Lays Stax Original?

It depends on your goals. Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide has 428.57142857143 calories, while Lays Stax Original has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide vegan?

No, Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beachbarchocolat beurre d’arachide and Lays Stax Original?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.