Beef Chuck vs Kellogg'S Pancakes Maple 3.03Oz
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Beef Chuck
Kellogg'S Pancakes Maple 3.03Oz
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Beef Chuck and Kellogg'S Pancakes Maple 3.03Oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef Chuck is the clear winner. With 28 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Beef Chuck takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kellogg'S Pancakes Maple 3.03Oz contains 13.953488372093g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Beef Chuck offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Kellogg'S Pancakes Maple 3.03Oz in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Beef Chuck or Kellogg'S Pancakes Maple 3.03Oz?
Beef Chuck appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Beef Chuck vegan?
No, Beef Chuck is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Beef Chuck and Kellogg'S Pancakes Maple 3.03Oz?
There is a difference of 28 calories per 100g between the two products.
