Head-to-Head Analysis

Beef Chuck vs tender white popcorn with sea salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Beef Chuck

Beef Chuck

Not Vegan
VS
Package of tender white popcorn with sea salt

tender white popcorn with sea salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
205 kcal
Energy
494 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
14.3g
Fat
21.2g
18.8g
Protein
10.6g
0.2g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beef Chuck and tender white popcorn with sea salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef Chuck is the clear winner. With 289 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Beef Chuck offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming tender white popcorn with sea salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beef Chuck or tender white popcorn with sea salt?

It depends on your goals. Beef Chuck has 205 calories, while tender white popcorn with sea salt has 494 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Beef Chuck vegan?

No, Beef Chuck is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beef Chuck and tender white popcorn with sea salt?

There is a difference of 289 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.