Beef Franks vs Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Beef Franks
Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Beef Franks and Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Beef Franks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 94 more calories per 100g than Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Beef Franks takes the lead with only 1.89g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil contains 4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Beef Franks or Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil?
It depends on your goals. Beef Franks has 321 calories, while Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil has 227 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Beef Franks vegan?
No, Beef Franks is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Beef Franks and Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil?
There is a difference of 94 calories per 100g between the two products.
