Head-to-Head Analysis

Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered vs reduced fat triscuit crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered

Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of reduced fat triscuit crackers

reduced fat triscuit crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
8.9g
39.3g
Protein
10.7g
4.6g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered and reduced fat triscuit crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered is the clear winner. With 107 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered contains significantly more sugar (21.43g) compared to the milder reduced fat triscuit crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, reduced fat triscuit crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered offers a protein boost with 39.29g per 100g, outperforming reduced fat triscuit crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered or reduced fat triscuit crackers?

It depends on your goals. Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered has 286 calories, while reduced fat triscuit crackers has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered vegan?

No, Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beef jerky meat snacks, peppered and reduced fat triscuit crackers?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.