Beef merlot vs Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Beef merlot
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Beef merlot and Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef merlot is the clear winner. With 166 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Beef merlot contains significantly more sugar (2.23g) compared to the milder Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Beef merlot offers a protein boost with 4.83g per 100g, outperforming Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Beef merlot or Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives?
It depends on your goals. Beef merlot has 66.9 calories, while Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 233.333333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Beef merlot vegan?
No, Beef merlot is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Beef merlot and Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives?
There is a difference of 166 calories per 100g between the two products.
