Head-to-Head Analysis

Beef New York Strip Steak Angus vs Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Beef New York Strip Steak Angus

Beef New York Strip Steak Angus

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean

Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
232 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
0g
Sugars
14.3g
16.1g
Fat
46.4g
20.5g
Protein
14.3g
0.1g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beef New York Strip Steak Angus and Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef New York Strip Steak Angus is the clear winner. With 339 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Beef New York Strip Steak Angus takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean contains 14.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Beef New York Strip Steak Angus offers a protein boost with 20.5g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beef New York Strip Steak Angus or Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean?

Beef New York Strip Steak Angus appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Beef New York Strip Steak Angus vegan?

No, Beef New York Strip Steak Angus is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beef New York Strip Steak Angus and Chocolate Covered Hunks - Cashews + Vanilla Bean?

There is a difference of 339 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.