Head-to-Head Analysis

Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style vs Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style

Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan

Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
345 kcal
Energy
471 kcal
0g
Sugars
32.4g
27.4g
Fat
17.7g
19g
Protein
5.9g
1.5g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style and Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style is the clear winner. With 126 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan contains 32.35g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style offers a protein boost with 19g per 100g, outperforming Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style or Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan?

Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style vegan?

No, Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beef & Pork Meatballs Italian Style and Gamesa, emperador, sandwich cookies, pecan?

There is a difference of 126 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.