Head-to-Head Analysis

Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit vs WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit

Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit

Not Vegan
VS
Package of WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES

WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
64.3 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0.7g
Sugars
8.3g
2.1g
Fat
16.7g
7.9g
Protein
4.2g
1.1g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit and WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit is the clear winner. With 436 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit takes the lead with only 0.714g of sugar per 100g, whereas WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES contains 8.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit offers a protein boost with 7.86g per 100g, outperforming WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit or WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES?

Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit vegan?

No, Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beef Roast With Vegetables Slow Cooker Meal Kit and WHITE CHEDDAR RICE CAKES?

There is a difference of 436 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.