Head-to-Head Analysis

Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip vs Black Forest Uncured Ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip

Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Black Forest Uncured Ham

Black Forest Uncured Ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
107 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
2.7g
0g
Protein
21.4g
0g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip and Black Forest Uncured Ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip is the clear winner. With 107 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip or Black Forest Uncured Ham?

It depends on your goals. Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip has 0 calories, while Black Forest Uncured Ham has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip vegan?

No, Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beef Sirloin Tri-Tip and Black Forest Uncured Ham?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.