Head-to-Head Analysis

Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins vs Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins

Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick

Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
39.3g
Sugars
4.8g
25g
Fat
41.9g
7.1g
Protein
21g
0.8g
Salt
3.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins and Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins contains significantly more sugar (39.3g) compared to the milder Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick (4.84g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins or Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick?

It depends on your goals. Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins has 536 calories, while Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins vegan?

No, Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Belgian Butter Chocolate Almond Thins and Jack Link's Wild Mild Snack Stick?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.