Head-to-Head Analysis

Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted vs Jumbo Pitted Black Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted

Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jumbo Pitted Black Olives

Jumbo Pitted Black Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607 kcal
Energy
178.6 kcal
42.9g
Sugars
0g
46.4g
Fat
17.9g
3.6g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted and Jumbo Pitted Black Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted is the more energy-dense option here, packing 428 more calories per 100g than Jumbo Pitted Black Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted contains significantly more sugar (42.9g) compared to the milder Jumbo Pitted Black Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jumbo Pitted Black Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Jumbo Pitted Black Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted or Jumbo Pitted Black Olives?

It depends on your goals. Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted has 607 calories, while Jumbo Pitted Black Olives has 178.57142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted vegan?

No, Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Belgian Truffles Cocoa Dusted and Jumbo Pitted Black Olives?

There is a difference of 428 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.