Head-to-Head Analysis

Bi League Chew Outta Here Original vs Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Bi League Chew Outta Here Original

Bi League Chew Outta Here Original

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips

Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333.3 kcal
Energy
280 kcal
66.7g
Sugars
2g
0g
Fat
6g
0g
Protein
5g
0g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bi League Chew Outta Here Original and Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bi League Chew Outta Here Original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 53 more calories per 100g than Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Bi League Chew Outta Here Original contains significantly more sugar (66.67g) compared to the milder Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips (2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bi League Chew Outta Here Original or Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips?

It depends on your goals. Bi League Chew Outta Here Original has 333.33 calories, while Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips has 280 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bi League Chew Outta Here Original vegan?

No, Bi League Chew Outta Here Original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bi League Chew Outta Here Original and Uncle Saba’s Lentil and chickpea chips?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.