Head-to-Head Analysis

Big Sky Blend Trail Mix vs Absolutely gluten free, flatbread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Big Sky Blend Trail Mix

Big Sky Blend Trail Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Absolutely gluten free, flatbread

Absolutely gluten free, flatbread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
1.4g
40g
Fat
14.3g
23.3g
Protein
2.1g
2g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Big Sky Blend Trail Mix and Absolutely gluten free, flatbread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Big Sky Blend Trail Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 138 more calories per 100g than Absolutely gluten free, flatbread. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Big Sky Blend Trail Mix contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Absolutely gluten free, flatbread (1.43g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Absolutely gluten free, flatbread is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Big Sky Blend Trail Mix offers a protein boost with 23.3g per 100g, outperforming Absolutely gluten free, flatbread in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Big Sky Blend Trail Mix or Absolutely gluten free, flatbread?

It depends on your goals. Big Sky Blend Trail Mix has 567 calories, while Absolutely gluten free, flatbread has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Big Sky Blend Trail Mix vegan?

No, Big Sky Blend Trail Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Big Sky Blend Trail Mix and Absolutely gluten free, flatbread?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.