Head-to-Head Analysis

Biscoff vs Waffle cones

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Biscoff

Biscoff

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Waffle cones

Waffle cones

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
451.6 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
38.7g
Sugars
28.6g
19.4g
Fat
3.6g
6.5g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Biscoff and Waffle cones side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Biscoff is the more energy-dense option here, packing 23 more calories per 100g than Waffle cones. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Biscoff contains significantly more sugar (38.709677419355g) compared to the milder Waffle cones (28.571428571429g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Waffle cones is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Biscoff or Waffle cones?

It depends on your goals. Biscoff has 451.61290322581 calories, while Waffle cones has 428.57142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Biscoff vegan?

No, Biscoff is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Biscoff and Waffle cones?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.