Head-to-Head Analysis

Biscoff vs Fig & Walnut Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Biscoff

Biscoff

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Fig & Walnut Bites

Fig & Walnut Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
480 kcal
Energy
340 kcal
40g
Sugars
38g
20g
Fat
16g
4g
Protein
6g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Biscoff and Fig & Walnut Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Biscoff is the more energy-dense option here, packing 140 more calories per 100g than Fig & Walnut Bites. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Biscoff contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Fig & Walnut Bites (38g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Fig & Walnut Bites is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Biscoff or Fig & Walnut Bites?

It depends on your goals. Biscoff has 480 calories, while Fig & Walnut Bites has 340 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Biscoff vegan?

No, Biscoff is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Biscoff and Fig & Walnut Bites?

There is a difference of 140 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.