Head-to-Head Analysis

Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix vs Nestle premier white morsel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix

Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nestle premier white morsel

Nestle premier white morsel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
365 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
14.3g
Sugars
64.3g
4.8g
Fat
28.6g
9.5g
Protein
7.1g
1.9g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix and Nestle premier white morsel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix is the clear winner. With 206 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix takes the lead with only 14.29g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nestle premier white morsel contains 64.29g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix offers a protein boost with 9.52g per 100g, outperforming Nestle premier white morsel in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix or Nestle premier white morsel?

Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix vegan?

No, Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bisquick Shake 'n Pour Buttermilk Pancake Mix and Nestle premier white morsel?

There is a difference of 206 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.