Head-to-Head Analysis

Black Angus Chuck Roast vs Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Black Angus Chuck Roast

Black Angus Chuck Roast

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
185 kcal
Energy
54 kcal
0g
Sugars
2.3g
11.5g
Fat
0g
18.5g
Protein
0.8g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Black Angus Chuck Roast and Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Black Angus Chuck Roast is the more energy-dense option here, packing 131 more calories per 100g than Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Black Angus Chuck Roast takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts contains 2.31g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Black Angus Chuck Roast offers a protein boost with 18.5g per 100g, outperforming Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Black Angus Chuck Roast or Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts?

It depends on your goals. Black Angus Chuck Roast has 185 calories, while Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts has 54 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Black Angus Chuck Roast vegan?

No, Black Angus Chuck Roast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Black Angus Chuck Roast and Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts?

There is a difference of 131 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.