Head-to-Head Analysis

Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham vs filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham

Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Package of filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate

filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
1600 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
50g
2.7g
Fat
33.3g
17.9g
Protein
6.7g
1.9g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham and filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham is the clear winner. With 1493 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate contains 50g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham or filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate?

Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham vegan?

No, Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham and filled salted peanut butter in Milk Chocolate?

There is a difference of 1493 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.