Head-to-Head Analysis

Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars vs Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars

Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars

Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
343 kcal
Energy
375 kcal
31.4g
Sugars
12.5g
7.1g
Fat
12.5g
5.7g
Protein
25g
0.6g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars and Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars is the clear winner. With 32 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars contains significantly more sugar (31.4g) compared to the milder Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars (12.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars or Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars?

It depends on your goals. Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars has 343 calories, while Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars vegan?

No, Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blackberry Graham Soft-Baked Cereal Bars and Salted Caramel Protein & Fiber Bars?

There is a difference of 32 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.