Head-to-Head Analysis

Bleached Diced Almonds vs Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Bleached Diced Almonds

Bleached Diced Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum

Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
250 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
100g
50g
Fat
0g
23.3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bleached Diced Almonds and Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Bleached Diced Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 317 more calories per 100g than Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Bleached Diced Almonds takes the lead with only 3.33g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum contains 100g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Bleached Diced Almonds offers a protein boost with 23.3g per 100g, outperforming Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bleached Diced Almonds or Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum?

It depends on your goals. Bleached Diced Almonds has 567 calories, while Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum has 250 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Bleached Diced Almonds vegan?

No, Bleached Diced Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bleached Diced Almonds and Pure mint with herbal accents sugar free gum?

There is a difference of 317 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.