Head-to-Head Analysis

Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt vs Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt

Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk

Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
82.4 kcal
Energy
59.3 kcal
11.2g
Sugars
9.3g
1.2g
Fat
1.1g
4.1g
Protein
3.4g
0.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt and Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 23 more calories per 100g than Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt contains significantly more sugar (11.176470588235g) compared to the milder Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk (9.3220338983051g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt or Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk?

It depends on your goals. Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt has 82.352941176471 calories, while Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk has 59.322033898305 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt vegan?

No, Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blended raspberry lowfat yogurt and Ready to drink low fat chocolate milk?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.