Head-to-Head Analysis

Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube vs M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube

Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube

Not Vegan
VS
Package of M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size

M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
605 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
4.7g
Sugars
63.3g
55.8g
Fat
20g
20.9g
Protein
3.3g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube and M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube is the more energy-dense option here, packing 138 more calories per 100g than M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube takes the lead with only 4.65g of sugar per 100g, whereas M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size contains 63.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube offers a protein boost with 20.9g per 100g, outperforming M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube or M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size?

It depends on your goals. Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube has 605 calories, while M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size has 467 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube vegan?

No, Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blue Diamond Roasted Almonds Tube and M&M's Milk Chocolate Share Size?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.