BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE vs Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE
Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE and Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE is the more energy-dense option here, packing 51 more calories per 100g than Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE contains significantly more sugar (2.5352112676056g) compared to the milder Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE offers a protein boost with 2.2535211267606g per 100g, outperforming Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE or Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix?
It depends on your goals. BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE has 50.704225352113 calories, while Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE vegan?
No, BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between BLUE ESSENTIALS 100% PLANT BASED SHAKE and Hydration Multiplier Electrolyte Drink Mix?
There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.
