Head-to-Head Analysis

Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy vs Meatless spicy patties

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy

Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Meatless spicy patties

Meatless spicy patties

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
267 kcal
Energy
140 kcal
21.3g
Sugars
0.5g
0g
Fat
5g
26.7g
Protein
8g
0.4g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy and Meatless spicy patties side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 127 more calories per 100g than Meatless spicy patties. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy contains significantly more sugar (21.3g) compared to the milder Meatless spicy patties (0.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Meatless spicy patties is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy offers a protein boost with 26.7g per 100g, outperforming Meatless spicy patties in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy or Meatless spicy patties?

It depends on your goals. Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy has 267 calories, while Meatless spicy patties has 140 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy vegan?

No, Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blue Raspberry Protein Packed Gummy and Meatless spicy patties?

There is a difference of 127 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.