Head-to-Head Analysis

BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA vs Organic Instant Oatmeal Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA

BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Instant Oatmeal Original

Organic Instant Oatmeal Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433.3 kcal
Energy
361 kcal
23.3g
Sugars
1g
16.7g
Fat
6.5g
10g
Protein
13.2g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA and Organic Instant Oatmeal Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA is the more energy-dense option here, packing 72 more calories per 100g than Organic Instant Oatmeal Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA contains significantly more sugar (23.3333333333333g) compared to the milder Organic Instant Oatmeal Original (0.99g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Instant Oatmeal Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA or Organic Instant Oatmeal Original?

It depends on your goals. BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA has 433.333333333333 calories, while Organic Instant Oatmeal Original has 361 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA vegan?

No, BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between BLUEBERRY HEMP ANCIENT GRAIN GRANOLA and Organic Instant Oatmeal Original?

There is a difference of 72 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.