Head-to-Head Analysis

Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt vs Sliced Colby Jack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt

Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced Colby Jack

Sliced Colby Jack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
88 kcal
Energy
368 kcal
7.2g
Sugars
0g
2g
Fat
31.6g
9.6g
Protein
21.1g
0.1g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt and Sliced Colby Jack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt is the clear winner. With 280 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt contains significantly more sugar (7.2g) compared to the milder Sliced Colby Jack (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced Colby Jack is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt or Sliced Colby Jack?

It depends on your goals. Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt has 88 calories, while Sliced Colby Jack has 368 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt vegan?

No, Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blueberry icelandic cream-skyr strained lowfat yogurt and Sliced Colby Jack?

There is a difference of 280 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.