Blueberry Light vs Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Blueberry Light
Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Blueberry Light and Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Blueberry Light is the clear winner. With 47 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Blueberry Light takes the lead with only 5.88g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Blueberry Light offers a protein boost with 3.53g per 100g, outperforming Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Blueberry Light or Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor?
Blueberry Light appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Blueberry Light vegan?
No, Blueberry Light is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Blueberry Light and Soft Australian Licorice, original flavor?
There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.
