Head-to-Head Analysis

Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go vs Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go

Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q

Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
19.4g
Sugars
7.1g
2.1g
Fat
35.7g
5.5g
Protein
50g
0.2g
Salt
5.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go and Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go is the clear winner. With 446 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go contains significantly more sugar (19.4g) compared to the milder Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go or Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q?

It depends on your goals. Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go has 125 calories, while Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go vegan?

No, Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blueberry Low Fat Yogurt on the Go and Bar-B-Q Flavored Fried Pork Skins, Bar-B-Q?

There is a difference of 446 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.