Head-to-Head Analysis

Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt vs Arrowhead water spring

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt

Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Arrowhead water spring

Arrowhead water spring

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
45.1 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
7.3g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
3.4g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt and Arrowhead water spring side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 45 more calories per 100g than Arrowhead water spring. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt contains significantly more sugar (7.33g) compared to the milder Arrowhead water spring (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Arrowhead water spring is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt offers a protein boost with 3.38g per 100g, outperforming Arrowhead water spring in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt or Arrowhead water spring?

It depends on your goals. Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt has 45.1 calories, while Arrowhead water spring has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt vegan?

No, Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blueberry Non-fat Drinkable Yogurt and Arrowhead water spring?

There is a difference of 45 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.