Head-to-Head Analysis

Blueberry shortbread Cookies vs Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blueberry shortbread Cookies

Blueberry shortbread Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo

Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
429 kcal
Energy
518 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
7.1g
21.4g
Fat
28.2g
3.6g
Protein
7.1g
0.5g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blueberry shortbread Cookies and Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Blueberry shortbread Cookies is the clear winner. With 89 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blueberry shortbread Cookies contains significantly more sugar (21.4g) compared to the milder Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo (7.06g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blueberry shortbread Cookies or Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo?

It depends on your goals. Blueberry shortbread Cookies has 429 calories, while Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo has 518 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blueberry shortbread Cookies vegan?

No, Blueberry shortbread Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blueberry shortbread Cookies and Zapp s new orleans kettlestyle potato chips voodoo?

There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.