Head-to-Head Analysis

Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties vs Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties

Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling

Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
197.2 kcal
Energy
370 kcal
0g
Sugars
31.5g
8.5g
Fat
11.1g
15.5g
Protein
5.6g
1.6g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties and Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties is the clear winner. With 173 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling contains 31.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties offers a protein boost with 15.492957746479g per 100g, outperforming Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties or Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling?

Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties vegan?

No, Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Boca spicy chik’n veggie patties and Toasties Concord Grape Superfood Jam Filling?

There is a difference of 173 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.