Head-to-Head Analysis

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak vs Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend

Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
29.4g
14.3g
Fat
35.3g
20.5g
Protein
11.8g
0.1g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak and Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak is the clear winner. With 286 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend contains 29.411764705882g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak offers a protein boost with 20.5g per 100g, outperforming Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak or Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend?

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak vegan?

No, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak and Omega Trek Mix Dried Cranberry & Roasted Nut Blend?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.