Head-to-Head Analysis

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak vs Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest)

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest)

Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest)

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
607.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
28.6g
14.3g
Fat
39.3g
20.5g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak and Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest) side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak is the clear winner. With 393 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest) contains 28.5714g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak offers a protein boost with 20.5g per 100g, outperforming Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest) in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak or Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest)?

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak vegan?

No, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak and Dark Chocolate With Forest Mint (Rainforest)?

There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.