Head-to-Head Analysis

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak vs Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N

Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
132 kcal
Energy
25 kcal
0g
Sugars
4g
4.4g
Fat
0g
22g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak and Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N contains 4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak offers a protein boost with 22g per 100g, outperforming Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak or Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N?

It depends on your goals. Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak has 132 calories, while Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N has 25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak vegan?

No, Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Boneless Beef Top Sirloin Steak and Cough Drops Citrus Assorted 1X14 1N?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.